Keyline vs Infisical

Infisical is the open-source secrets platform: broad, self-hostable, feature-rich. Keyline is the narrow tool for one job. Both are honest choices; here is the split.

The short version

Choose Infisical if you want a self-hosted platform, secret scanning, dynamic secrets, K8s operators, and SSO. It aims at the whole secrets lifecycle for growing orgs.
Choose Keyline if you are a 2 to 10 person team whose actual problem is "our .env lives in Slack". Two-minute setup, $19 flat, and a zero-knowledge design where our servers cannot read your secrets.

Side by side

KeylineInfisical
ScopeShare .env files, control access, audit everythingFull secrets platform: scanning, rotation, dynamic secrets, PKI
HostingHosted only, by designSelf-hostable or cloud
Encryption modelZero-knowledge end to end: device keys, server holds ciphertext it cannot decryptEncrypted at rest; the platform can decrypt to power server-side features
SetupTwo minutes, four commandsReal platform setup: projects, machine identities, integrations
Pricing$19 flat, whole teamFree tier, then per seat on cloud
AuditHash-chained, anchored to a public repo dailyAudit logs on paid tiers
SourcePublicOpen source

The honest framing

Infisical is what you graduate to when a platform team owns secrets as infrastructure. Keyline is what you use so that day arrives later and calmer: the .env you already have, encrypted properly, shared in one command, revocable in one command. If you are evaluating both, the question is not features, it is "who maintains this": with Keyline the answer is nobody on your team.

Two minutes to the first encrypted push

$ curl -fsSL keyline.sh/install | sh

Solo is free forever. Team is $19 flat for up to 10 people, 14-day trial.

See the whole journey

No card for Solo. Your secrets are encrypted before they leave your laptop.